Cyber Risk Research & Applied Studies
1. Observe What changed? β
2. Understand Why does it matter? β
3. Track How does risk evolve? β
4. Predict What happens next? β
5. Decide What to do? β
6. Verify What happened? β
7. Remember Persistent memory
π¬ Core Research Engines
Section titled βπ¬ Core Research Enginesβ π Historical Replay Reconstructs discrete threat observability at Day 0, Day 1, Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 30, and Day 90 intervals.
π¬ Forensic Autopsies Exhaustive post-mortem investigations of landmark security failures dissecting root causes and missed signals.
𧬠Vulnerability Genome Structural taxonomic dissection across 8 orthogonal chromosomes to isolate true root causes.
β³ Cyber Risk Time Machine Discrete temporal snapshot diff engine navigating historical threat states.
π Landmark Research Publications
Section titled βπ Landmark Research PublicationsβExplore in-depth technical investigations into advanced threat mechanics and agentic AI vulnerabilities:
Adversarial Agentic Workflows & Multi-Step Hijacking Empirical analysis of indirect prompt injection and tool execution hijacking in LangChain and MCP architectures.
GPU Memory & KV-Cache Forensics in LLM Systems Techniques for recovering residual prompt artifacts and conversation histories directly from accelerator VRAM.
The AF_ALG Race Condition (CVE-2025-39964) Forensic deconstruction of the Linux kernel cryptographic socket use-after-free and delayed weaponization trajectory.
ActiveMQ Artemis Pre-Auth Queue Destruction (CVE-2026-67593) Technical dissection of unauthenticated state wiping across Openwire protocol boundaries.
ποΈ Methodological Rigor
Section titled βποΈ Methodological RigorβAll research adheres to the published Hermes Epistemic Standard:
- Zero Hallucination: Reconstructed data is explicitly labeled
RETROSPECTIVEorREPLAY. - Peer-Verifiable Telemetry: Exploits and artifacts cross-referenced with public git commits and packet traces.
- Falsifiable Claims: Theoretical assumptions separated from observable facts.