Skip to content

Agent Blast Radius: Kinetic Damage Propagation Simulator & Containment Workbench


Simulate multi-hop breach cascades, inspect the 5-vector damage matrix, review verified incident benchmarks, or calculate your architecture’s Blast Radius Score (BRS) in the privacy-first client sandbox:

5 Damage Vectors Host, Data, IAM, Cost, Cascade
-75.5% Mean MicroVM Attenuation Verified blast reduction
4 Max Swarm Cascade Hops Peer-to-peer escalation
100% Client-Side Privacy (P7) Zero server transmission

Multi-Hop Agentic Breach Propagation Topology

Unlike traditional software confined to a static process, the breach of an autonomous agent propagates through RAG memory, ambient IAM tokens, and connected actuation tools to compromise the entire enterprise mesh in cascades.

Hop 01

Perception & Initial Injection

Indirect injection via RAG document, scraped web page, or hostile user input.

Entry Vector System Prompt Bypass
→
Hop 02

Reasoning & Tool Hijacking

The subverted model parameterizes actuation tools with arbitrary arguments (shell commands, API calls).

Tool Actuation Host Shell / REPL Exec
→
Hop 03

IAM Harvest & Host Breakout

Extraction of ambient cloud service credentials (AWS IMDS, GitHub PAT) and local filesystem persistence.

Lateral Pivot Privilege Escalation
→
Hop 04

Swarm Cascade & Kinetic Blast

Hostile directives dispatched to peer swarm agents via MCP, triggering automated production pipelines.

Terminal Blast Full Enterprise Subversion

The 5-Vector Blast Radius Assessment Matrix

The Blast Radius Score (BRS) quantifies kinetic potential damage from 0 to 100 across 5 weighted orthogonal dimensions.

host_infrastructure 25% Weight

Host & Infrastructure Reach

Depth of host OS compromise, local filesystem access, shell execution, Docker socket tampering, and hypervisor escape potential.

Maximum Severity Impact: Host takeover, container breakout, kernel rootkit persistence.
data_rag 25% Weight

Data & Memory Blast

Exposure, exfiltration, or adversarial poisoning of vector databases, enterprise knowledge bases, user conversations, and sensitive files.

Maximum Severity Impact: Persistent RAG poisoning, corporate secret leakage, cross-session sleeper payloads.
identity_iam 20% Weight

Identity & Credential Scope

Blast perimeter of credentials accessible to the agent: cloud IAM roles, OAuth tokens, SSH keys, API secrets, and inter-service authentication.

Maximum Severity Impact: Cloud tenant pivot, unauthorized database access, automated lateral movement.
financial_spend 15% Weight

Financial & Operational Burn

Financial damage caused by runaway autonomous loops, unconstrained API token consumption, third-party service fees, or Denial of Wallet.

Maximum Severity Impact: Budget exhaustion, upstream API rate lockout, unexpected cloud billing spikes.
cascade_propagation 15% Weight

Downstream Cascade Propagation

Propagation multiplier when compromised agent communicates with peer agents in a swarm, triggering downstream trusted actuators without re-validation.

Maximum Severity Impact: Swarm-wide subversion, automated production deployments, cascading system destabilization.

Containment Boundary Attenuation Factors (Ω_containment)

Containment Model Isolation Factor Blast Radius Attenuation Security Mechanism
Ephemeral MicroVM (Firecracker / Kata) 0.15 -85% Disposable virtual machine booted in <10ms with hardware-assisted hypervisor isolation, read-only rootfs, and dropped host network.
Application-Level Sandbox (gVisor / seccomp / AppArmor) 0.35 -65% Intercepted system calls via user-space kernel proxy with strict capabilities stripping and limited temporary filesystem.
Standard Container (Docker / Podman Default) 0.65 -35% Standard Linux namespaces and cgroups without custom seccomp profiles; vulnerable to Docker socket exposure and shared kernel escapes.
Unsandboxed Host Process 1.00 -0% Agent execution directly on developer workstation or server host OS; direct access to filesystem, local network, and environment variables.

Verified Real-World Incident Blast Profiles

Comparison between raw uncontained blast radius (bare host process) and residual blast radius under MicroVM isolation.

BLAST-2026-001 LangChain / Langflow
CVE-2026-27966 →

Langflow CSV Agent Unconstrained REPL Breakout

Raw Uncontained Blast 94.0
-75.5 with MicroVM
Contained Blast Score 18.5
Vector Breakdown (Raw Score):
Host:
95
Data:
80
IAM:
92
Cost:
40
Cascade:
88
Multi-Hop Attack Sequence:
  1. Adversarial CSV uploaded to conversational agent
  2. Pandas query generation poisoned with exec() payload
  3. Local Python REPL executes arbitrary shell command as host UID 1000
  4. AWS instance metadata service (IMDSv1) queried via curl
  5. Temporary IAM role credentials exfiltrated to adversary C2
BLAST-2026-002 Model Context Protocol (MCP)
AAP-004 →

MCP Untrusted Community Tool Protocol Hijacking

Raw Uncontained Blast 88.0
-74.0 with MicroVM
Contained Blast Score 14.0
Vector Breakdown (Raw Score):
Host:
85
Data:
90
IAM:
94
Cost:
25
Cascade:
70
Multi-Hop Attack Sequence:
  1. User connects third-party community MCP server for weather lookup
  2. Tool definition injects shadow tool 'system_diagnostics' with broad regex match
  3. Agent routes sensitive file reading task to shadow MCP server
  4. Local SSH private keys (~/.ssh/id_ed25519) and .env secrets read via stdio
  5. Secrets dispatched via outbound DNS tunneling subquery
BLAST-2026-003 Cursor AI IDE
CVE-2026-22708 →

Cursor IDE Agent Workspace Token Harvest & Command Chaining

Raw Uncontained Blast 91.5
-75.5 with MicroVM
Contained Blast Score 16.0
Vector Breakdown (Raw Score):
Host:
90
Data:
85
IAM:
95
Cost:
30
Cascade:
75
Multi-Hop Attack Sequence:
  1. Developer opens open-source repo with hidden instructions in README.md
  2. Agent scans workspace during contextual indexing
  3. Hidden instruction commands agent to run background build script
  4. Subshell executes curl fetching remote obfuscated payload
  5. GitHub Personal Access Token (.git-credentials) exfiltrated to attacker server
BLAST-2026-004 CrewAI / Multi-Agent Swarms
AAP-006 →

CrewAI Multi-Agent Swarm Lateral Trust Impersonation

Raw Uncontained Blast 86.0
-64.0 with MicroVM
Contained Blast Score 22.0
Vector Breakdown (Raw Score):
Host:
75
Data:
88
IAM:
82
Cost:
60
Cascade:
95
Multi-Hop Attack Sequence:
  1. Adversary inserts poisoned research abstract into enterprise vector DB
  2. Research Agent retrieves poisoned chunk during automated briefing task
  3. Research Agent synthesizes false security directive to Executive Agent
  4. Executive Agent trusts peer agent output without out-of-band verification
  5. Executive Agent triggers production deployment pipeline webhook deploying rogue image
BLAST-2026-005 Microsoft AutoGen
AAP-007 →

AutoGen Unbounded Recursive Loop & Cloud API Spend Burn

Raw Uncontained Blast 78.0
-70.0 with MicroVM
Contained Blast Score 8.0
Vector Breakdown (Raw Score):
Host:
30
Data:
40
IAM:
35
Cost:
98
Cascade:
65
Multi-Hop Attack Sequence:
  1. External customer query introduces paradoxical goal logic
  2. Two peer agents enter infinite refinement and validation dialogue
  3. Agent tools continuously spawn external API calls and cloud function executions
  4. No circuit breaker or financial rate-limiter halts the autonomous iteration
  5. 14,000 API calls executed in 2 hours costing $4,800 and exhausting rate quotas
BLAST-2026-006 OpenDevin / All-Hands AI
CVE-2026-76461 →

OpenDevin Container Breakout & Host Docker Socket Compromise

Raw Uncontained Blast 96.0
-84.0 with MicroVM
Contained Blast Score 12.0
Vector Breakdown (Raw Score):
Host:
99
Data:
85
IAM:
90
Cost:
45
Cascade:
92
Multi-Hop Attack Sequence:
  1. Agent instructed to debug Docker configuration file
  2. Prompt injection tricks model into mounting host /var/run/docker.sock
  3. Agent issues container command spawning privileged container with host root / mount
  4. Host filesystem accessed and persistence installed in /etc/cron.d/
  5. Full root host takeover bypassing container sandbox

Interactive Agent Blast Radius Simulator (P7)

Configure your agent architecture parameters to instantaneously evaluate its kinetic destruction potential, compute its BRS score, and generate your tailored containment plan.

ESTIMATED BLAST RADIUS SCORE 🔒 Client-Side P7
38.4 / 100
MODERATE BLAST

Bounded blast radius with moderate exfiltration hazard over outbound web channels.

Host & Infra:
45%
Data & RAG:
60%
Identity & IAM:
50%
Cost & Runaway:
35%
Swarm Cascade:
40%

📋 Priority Blast Containment Checklist:

  • Isolation MicroVM : Déployer Firecracker pour ramener le facteur d'isolation de l'hôte à 0.15.
  • Éphémérité IAM : Réduire la durée de vie des jetons STS à moins de 60 secondes avec portance sur ARN unique.
  • Coupe-Circuit Financier : Imposer un plafond matériel de 10 tours autonomes et 5.00$ de jetons par exécution.

1. Deconstructing the 5 Vectors of Agentic Destruction

Section titled “1. Deconstructing the 5 Vectors of Agentic Destruction”

When an autonomous agent is hijacked via prompt injection or malicious tool schemas, kinetic damage does not stay localized. Hermes evaluates damage along five orthogonal vectors:

graph TD
Compromise["Autonomous Agent Breach (AAP-001 / AAP-002)"] --> V1["1. Host & Infrastructure (B_host)"]
Compromise --> V2["2. Data & Memory Poisoning (B_data)"]
Compromise --> V3["3. Identity & Ambient Secrets (B_iam)"]
Compromise --> V4["4. Financial & Loop Burn (B_cost)"]
Compromise --> V5["5. Downstream Swarm Cascade (B_cascade)"]
V1 --> Impact1["Kernel Escape / Host RCE"]
V2 --> Impact2["Persistent RAG Poisoning"]
V3 --> Impact3["Cloud Tenant Compromise"]
V4 --> Impact4["Denial of Wallet"]
V5 --> Impact5["Enterprise Swarm Subversion"]
  1. Host & Infrastructure Reach (B_host — Weight 25%): Quantifies whether the agent can touch local filesystems, spawn subshells, interact with Docker sockets, or break out of container runtimes.
  2. Data & Memory Blast (B_data — Weight 25%): Quantifies the blast perimeter over corporate knowledge bases, embeddings stores, and episodic memory caches.
  3. Identity & Ambient Secrets (B_iam — Weight 20%): Evaluates the credentials accessible to the agent. Long-lived static API keys or broad cloud IAM roles allow attackers to pivot across SaaS platforms and cloud tenants.
  4. Financial & Operational Burn (B_cost — Weight 15%): Measures financial destruction stemming from unconstrained autonomous reasoning loops, high-frequency external API calls, and denial-of-wallet loops.
  5. Downstream Cascade Propagation (B_cascade — Weight 15%): Measures how easily a compromised specialist agent can issue trusted instructions to peer agents, triggering downstream production actions without human-in-the-loop validation.

2. Containment Attenuation: The MicroVM Paradigm

Section titled “2. Containment Attenuation: The MicroVM Paradigm”

The foundational insight of the Hermes Blast Radius Model (HBRM) is that hardware-enforced isolation attenuates damage multiplicatively:

BRS = min(100, RawComposite * Omega_containment)

Where Omega_containment represents the boundary attenuation factor:

  • Bare Host Process (Omega = 1.00): Zero attenuation. Shell breakout grants immediate host root compromise.
  • Default Docker Container (Omega = 0.65): Moderate attenuation, but vulnerable to shared kernel exploits, mounted Docker sockets, and network pivots.
  • Application Sandbox (gVisor / seccomp — Omega = 0.35): Strong attenuation via intercepted system calls and capability drops.
  • Ephemeral MicroVM (Firecracker / Kata — Omega = 0.15): Hardware-level virtualization isolation. Discarded automatically after task completion, reducing real-world damage by over 80%.

In alignment with Hermes Principle P6 (Machine-Readable First), all blast radius intelligence is exposed via static REST endpoints: